Canon EOS D30 FAQ


This FAQ is by no means official and by no means complete. Like all important hacks, it was created to scratch a personal itch, specifically all the repeated questions on the DP Review and Rob Galbraith web sites about the Canon EOS D30 digital SLR camera.

Feel free to email me with information you'd think would be a good addition to this FAQ. If you find any errors please let me know. If you disagree with some of the ideas presented here about the D30, that's OK but I reserve the right to editorialize as I see fit. Hope this is OK. Thanks.


Section 1 - General D30 Questions

1.1: What is the Canon EOS D30?

1.2: In general, what are the strengths of the D30? What's the good news?

  1. The number one good thing about the Canon D30 is that it keeps its promise and delivers what you would expect from a digital SLR that's also a member of the Canon EOS line. All the controls are where you expect them to be, your existing Canon USM lenses work perfectly, it all makes sense and there are no real gotchas or surprises. Even with its limitations, the D30 is still a great camera and will always be remembered as a breakthrough and a big win for Canon.

  2. Wonderful picture quality that exceeds 90% of the other cameras out there and rivals the remaining 10%. Most people are now in agreement that the quality exceeds 35mm film. People who really love the D30 will swear up and down that it captures the nuances and subtleties of the visible world better than anything else that's ever been invented and offered to the public. Yes, it does inspire that level of enthusiasm.

  3. If you are already familiar with the advantages of digital photography, rest assured that the D30 has them all, in spades. You can instantly review your pictures and see how they came out and delete what you don't want. No more money wasted on film, then more money wasted on processing just so you can find out that the one shot you really needed didn't come out. Furthermore, all this is even more true with the D30 since it is also a full SLR. The combination of instant feedback with fine-grained control results in a much higher ratio of "keepers" and also makes the camera a superb teaching/learning tool.

  4. You can take as many pictures as you want. The only limitation is the size of your compact flash card or microdrive. The LCD no longer tells you how many shots you've taken, it tells you how many more you can take, and with a decent-sized card it usually starts at 150 or more. It's amazing how fast you get used to that.

  5. Ability to switch ISO on the fly, along with an ISO range that runs from 100 to 1600, and actually gives acceptable results across the whole range. Once again, it's hard to live without this once you become accustomed to it.

  6. Battery life is excellent. Big pay-off for the CMOS engine. One fully-charged BP-511 battery pack will last for several hundred shots plus a good amount of review time on the LCD. But you should still buy an extra. When I start the day with two fully-charged packs, I can be certain that I will have enough juice for a full day of shooting, and that's a good feeling.

  7. RAW format gives you very fine-grained control over your images. Some people will always want to debate whether a 3.2 megapixel camera like the D30 is really up to doing professional-level work, but the option of using RAW format gives you the ability to squeeze every last bit of detail out of those 3.2 megapixels. There are people who routinely use D30 images to produce 20x30 prints and are very happy with the results.

1.3. In general, what are the weaknesses of the D30? What's the bad news?

  1. The most frequent complaint about the D30 is that autofocus performance just isn't good enough. Under low-light conditions it will often give up and hunt back and forth, refusing to lock onto the subject. Sometimes it even will do this in relatively good lighting conditions. While there are some pretty good workarounds for this (see section xx), why Canon hobbled a such an otherwise-wonderful camera in this manner remains a genuine mystery.

  2. Apart from the autofocus per se, the incandescent AF-assist lamp is basically useless. It distracts your subjects and doesn't really help the autofocus. Most D30 users just use the custom function menu to turn it off.

  3. Also related to autofocus is the viewfinder focusing screen. All it is is a piece of plastic with three rectangles. No LEDs that light up to tell you which focus point is active, no eye-control, and no split-prism to help you out when you need to fall back to manual focus.

  4. Number 4 on the list of D30 focusing problems is the fact that when you review your shots on the LCD, the zoom only goes down one level (3X from the normal LCD view). This is simply not sufficient to verify if a shot was in focus. It's not uncommon for the picture to look fine on the LCD but when you review it on a TV or PC monitor it turns out that just enough motion blur has crept in to ruin the shot and by then it's usually too late to get it again.

  5. The 1.6x focal length multiplier is great if you like to squeeze more zoom out of your zoom lenses, but if you rely upon the ability to do wide-angle shots, it really sucks and forces you to use bulkier/more expensive lenses to get an acceptable result, and even then it's still difficult to nail the low end. And you can't really use fish-eye lenses at all.

  6. The D30 is not compatible with inexpensive infrared remotes like the RC-1. Former Elan shooters miss this a lot. This camera has a lot of amateurish features, but you are forced to buy the pro-level accessories.

  7. The CMOS imaging engine is good, but it falls down badly if try to do time exposures longer than one, maybe two minutes at best, even with the "Long Exposure Noise Reduction" custom function turned on. You can't do astrophotography unless you have it mounted on a telescope and are doing short exposures. If you were hoping to do star-trail shots, you can just forget about it.

  8. This doesn't directly pertain to the camera, but the Canon-provided software is inadequate and does not allow for a good workflow, let alone a professional one. If you are working mostly with Jpegs and have a card reader, you're probably better off not installing Canon's software at all. If you need to use RAW format, the only way to get a decent workflow is to hunt down third-party shareware programs (See section xx).

1.4. Is the D30 better than film?

    That's a huge question. The overall issue of Digital vs. Film has many dimensions to it. In an attempt to provide a useful answer, here are some of the advantages of the D30/D60 and Digital SLR's in general, followed by a "rebuttal" from the perspective of a film photographer.

    Point: The image quality of the current crop of Digital SLR's exceeds 35mm film. Many people have confirmed this. The large-format prints that can be made from D30/D60/EOS-1D images are absolutely stunning.

    Counterpoint: People who want to believe that digital image quality is better than film love to trot out all these nerdy arguments about megapixels and line pairs per millimeter and all that. But let's say I take your bait, and agree that some of the inkjet prints I've seen are indeed quite nice. I have no argument that digital has advantages when it comes to certain aspects of photographic production, and the industry has been adapting to this for the past several years.

    But let's talk about something else. What about Art? People who love photography love it because there is something special about the interplay of light and film and chemical processes. Photography has been around for more than 150 years, and it's always been about coaxing something unique and beautiful out of a latent image on a photographically sensitive surface. Sorry but I'm just never going to work up that same level of enthusiasm for the latest "CCD" or "CMOS" chip that comes out of some high-tech fabrication plant.

    Also, people in the digital crowd love to talk about digital images being grainless, more three-dimensional, more lifelike. But for every one of them there's someone else who thinks the images look artificial, and not very flattering in the way they capture color and detail. This is especially true in portrait and glamour photography, where you often see people use Photoshop tricks to actually remove some of the detail or put simulated "grain" back into the picture to give it a more "film-like" texture. Am I the only person who sees a problem here?

    Point: The ability to instantly review images to check for exposure and focusing errors is an outstanding advantage over film. No one can really debate this point. By comparison film is just plain primitive.

    Counterpoint: That's a valid point, but with the current crop of cameras you really can't zoom down far enough in review mode to be sure you have "tack-sharp" focus. And while we're on the subject of focusing, the current digital cameras are notorious for having focusing problems. Many pros have sent D-SLR's back to their dealers over this exact issue. The EOS D30 and D60 are almost intolerable in this respect. The EOS 1D is a first step in the the right direction but it's still a far cry from the EOS 1n or 1v (which also happen to cost thousands of dollars less).

    Point: You can store hundreds of images on a compact flash card or microdrive. People get used to this very quickly. Film is very limited in comparison. You have to stop and reload just when you're getting "warmed up".

    Counterpoint: This is actually a very old debate in photography. A good photographer does not need to take hundreds of shots in order to get one or two "keepers". Being able to take 100 shots on a stretch is nice but not a pivotal issue for people who are used to film.

    And don't forget that you have to do something with those hundreds, even thousands, of pictures you take. The archival properties of film are very stable and well understood. By comparison, it's hard to find an example of a data storage technology even ten years old that still works today. This is the "dirty little secret" among computer professionals, the fact that computers have been with us for almost 50 years and the issue of reliable backups and archiving remains, fundamentally, an unsolved problem. Maybe in another ten years things will be better, if we're lucky.

    Point: It's much easier to get proper exposure with digital. The combination of instant review plus a live histogram is an outstanding advantage, especially in tricky exposure situations. Compared to digital, film is much less forgiving in this respect. Also with digital you can do a lot in Photoshop to rescue under- or over-exposed shots. With film, if you don't have the right density to start with there is very little you can do to compensate after the fact.

    Counterpoint: Thanks for mentioning Photoshop. The last thing on Earth I have time for is spending hour after hour mastering such a complex tool. Besides, everyone seems to have a different "recipe", for example, if I need to correct an exposure error do I use "Gamma Correction", or do I adjust the "Curves & Levels" or some other magic trick?

    Sometimes I really resent the arrogance of the digital crowd, the way they just take it for granted that everyone's a computer guru. I'd like to lock one of those smug little Photoshop wizards in a darkroom sometime and show them the kind of magic you can do with good enlarger technique, and still have time left over compared to having to Photoshop every single picture you take.

    Point: The ability to shift ISO on the fly is very, very cool. It's like having three or four cameras pre-loaded with 100, 200, 400, 800 film all available at the same time. Can't beat that!

    Counterpoint: A good photographer can "push" film and still get good results. If your only experience of film photography involves the low-quality stuff you get at the supermarket then you're probably not aware of that. Besides I've seen what the current crop of digital cameras can do at ISO 800 and above, and I can't say I'm all that impressed. And God forbid if you want to play around with long exposures or do night sky photography. Sorry, but digital is just not "there" yet.

    Point: Digital gives you complete control over the process. No more sending film out to a lab, which takes time and allows for the possiblity of lost film or processing errors.

    Counterpoint: Digital isn't perfect either. People often lose images due to faulty microdrives or hard disk crashes or failures in their backup process. And while we're talking about "control over the process" let's talk about the constant need to upgrade to new computer hardware and software to keep up with the huge files these cameras churn out. I rely on my processes to make my living. If I have to spend time messing around with my computer setup, that costs me a lot up-front that I have to work that much harder to get back. And don't even get me started on the quality level of the currently available software. Photographers who are already computer hobbyists on the side may find this situation acceptable, but they are still in the minority.

    And if you think I'm behind the times and not "with it," I have friends who are a lot less computer-savvy than me, and for them all this talk about Jpeg's and TIFF's and megapixels is just so much gibberish. When all this digital stuff gets simple and reliable enough that even the most humble worker in a photo lab can use it, then you'll have my attention. Sorry, but that's the reality of this business.

    Point: Digital Photography is just plain cool. In particular, there is a very tangible sense among Digital SLR enthusiasts that this is where the future of photography lies. It feels good to be a part of that.

    Counterpoint: That may be true, but the future is not here yet for the majority of film SLR photographers. The current crop of D-SLR's are too expensive, and aren't there yet as far as features are concerned. I'm quite happy to continue my work and let other people shake out the problems with all this new technology. Let's face it, digital cameras are electronic goods, and with electronics you can always count on something coming out next year that's better and cheaper, that will make what I have now obsolete.

    There's one more point I'd like to make, and I think I speak for most of my profession when I say that I have no problem with the young people who are just starting in Photography learning all the new digital techniques, because there's a lot of good stuff going on right now. Just don't forget where it all came from, and the incredible range of beauty that's been captured since the first Daguerreotypes of the 1840's, all the way through to what's going on today. The best way to prepare for the future is to understand the past, and I think that aspect of photography is the first thing to get lost in all this debate, which is quite unfortunate.


Section 2 - Questions Related to the D30 Format

(In other words, the 1.6x multiplier thing)

2.1. How does the 1.6x focal length multiplier affect Depth of Field? 2.2. Isn't it true that the smaller format of the D30 has an impact on Depth of Field, apart from the focal-length issues?


Section 3 - Questions Related to D30 Image Processing

3.1. What's the difference between RAW and Jpeg? 3.2. How exactly does the D30 create a RAW image? 3.3. How exactly does the D30 create a Jpeg image? 3.4. When a Jpeg image is rotated in the camera, is the rotation lossless? 3.5. Is RAW really "better" then Jpeg?


Section 4 - General Questions Related to Using the D30

4.1. What's the story with auto-focus and the D30? 4.2. Did Canon hold back on the auto-focus because of an agreement with Kodak? 4.3. How can I improve the D30's auto-focus performance? 4.4. I'm still not satisfied with the auto-focus. Is there anything else I can do? 4.5. If I move auto-focus to the AE Lock button using Custon Function 2, is there any way to "recover" the AE Lock behavior while the camera is in this mode? 4.6. If I get one of the Speedlite flash units to help with the auto-focus, can I permanently disable the internal incandescent lamp, so that I don't have to remember to use Custom Function 5 each time I put the flash unit on? 4.7. If I get one of the Speedlite flash units to help with the auto-focus, can I turn off the flash and just use it as an AF-assist lamp? 4.8. Does Canon offer an upgrade to replace the incandescent AF-assist lamp with an IR lamp? 4.9. Does Canon offer an upgrade to replace the focusing screen with one that has light-up LED's, or a better split-prism for manual focusing? 4.10. Why does the incandescent AF light still turn on even though I'm using a Speedlite flash unit? 4.11. What lens should I use with the D30? 4.12. Does anyone make lenses that are specifically designed for the D30's 1.6x multiplier (e.g. a D30 fish-eye lens)? 4.13. What does Custom Function 9 actually do? Where is the "Lens AF Stop Button" on the D30?


Section 5 - D30 "Tech Notes" from Chuck Westfall

5.1. What do all the error codes mean?

5.2. What did Chuck have to say about the whole auto-focus issue?

5.3. What did Chuck have to say about flash exposure?

5.4. What did Chuck have to say about Jpegs and Jpeg compression levels?


Section 6 - D60-Specific Information

6.1. What do all the error codes mean?


Email: Richard Smith (rss@idiom.com)
Last modified: July 13, 2002.